• About- Legally Speaking
  • Back to Grimes Legal Inc.
Legally Speaking - Legal Recruiter Blog Legally Speaking - Legal Recruiter Blog
  • About- Legally Speaking
  • Back to Grimes Legal Inc.
онлайн займ на карту мгновенно

National legal recruiter Nancy Grimes asks: Are law firms focused on the wrong sort of success?

Home Attorney Articles National legal recruiter Nancy Grimes asks: Are law firms focused on the wrong sort of success?
National legal recruiter Nancy Grimes asks: Are law firms focused on the wrong sort of success?

National legal recruiter Nancy Grimes asks: Are law firms focused on the wrong sort of success?

Aug 30, 2018 | Posted by In the News | Attorney Articles, Attorney Jobs, Lawyer Articles, Lawyer Jobs, Legal Careers, Legal Employment, Legal Jobs, Legal Recruiter | 0 comments |

Top placement professional Nancy Grimes has experience in the legal community. An observation: Too Many Legal Awards– Too Little Customer Satisfaction

Mark A. Cohen
Shutterstock

Law is staging its own version of “every kid gets a trophy.” Its award season is longer than baseball’s, and the list of award categories rivals the Oscars. Every week, all over the globe, the legal industry throws gala dinners to celebrate its “innovators,” “visionaries,” and “pioneers.”  These gatherings afford attendees a chance to dress up, schmooze with peers, feel important, and convince themselves that their industry is performing splendidly. Legal providers are hearing “Celebration” while for buyers it’s “I can’t get no satisfaction.”

Legal consumers are not handing out many plaudits to law firms. A 2017 study of the British legal market commissioned by LexisNexis and Judge Business School at Cambridge University contains a stark finding: ‘There is unambiguous evidence of a significant and persistent disconnect between law firms and their clients.”  The disconnect has resulted in a steady migration of work from firms to corporate legal departments as well as a growing client receptivity to service providers and other “alternative” (now mainstream) sources for legal services. That’s not only the pattern in the UK but also in the US and globally.

The LexisNexis survey cites four persistent causes of the client/firm disconnect: (1) clients want solutions and law firms offer advice; (2) law firms strive for perfection while clients generally want a “good enough” solution; (3) law firms fail to provide cost and time predictability–they have not invested in business staples such as project and process management capability and (4) a knowledge gap. A stunning 40% of respondents in the LexisNexis survey noted that senior partners of panel firms lacked more than a basic knowledge of their businesses. That underscores a more fundamental challenge confronting lawyers: they must offer more than legal expertise. Legal buyers want answers to business challenges—at the speed of business. That means legal and business expertise—supported by technology and process—is required. That’s not the model that traditional law firm partnerships are built on.

To Connect With Customers, Connect Your Company

The 2017 Georgetown Report cites the “erosion of the traditional law firm franchise,’ a euphemism for “clients don’t need large law firms to handle many legal tasks.” The 2018 Report concludes that the internal steps law firms have taken to preserve profit-per-partner (PPP) have failed to address chronic, systemic deficiencies. The Report concludes that “Too many law firms are still fighting the last war “applying old fixes to new market conditions.” Law firms are spending more on marketing but remain largely unresponsive to client demands for “faster, better, cheaper” solutions that: (1) solve business problems; (2) with better customer service; (3) deploying the right resource to the task; (4) commensurate with its value and risk; and (5) capturing intellectual capital and data that can be leveraged.  Why? Increasing marketing budgets, handing out more awards, and chanting “innovation” creates a (false) impression of client-centricity. These moves are buying time for senior partners who are well into the back nine of their careers and generally disinclined to invest in the firm’s future that offers them no financial return. But they are not scoring points–or solving deficiencies–with clients. The recent wave of associate increases by Milbank and scores of other firms that followed is evidence of law firm tone-deafness to clients.

Problem Solving and Consumer Perspective Are What Counts

Law’s obsession with awards and innovation has eclipsed focus on solving its major challenges: (1) expanding access to legal services to the tens of millions of individuals and businesses presently unserved; (2) improving the delivery of service to existing legal consumers and garnering their satisfaction and loyalty; (3) preserving the rule of law by safeguarding democratic institutions; and (4) delivering pro bono services to those in need. Solving these challenges requires a long-term approach that is inimical to the short-term mindset of most law firms. It requires a new organizational, economic, talent management, and reward model. Most of all, it inverts provider focus from “what works for us?” to “what works for the consumer? Awards and claims of “innovation” provide instant—if not illusory—gratification but do not address these underlying industry challenges.

There is a correlation between the proliferation of legal awards and the industry’s overheated use of the word “innovation.” Self-congratulation and buzzwords do not change the widely held consumer perception that legal delivery–especially BigLaw– is out-of-synch with business. It’s not just the exorbitant cost of legal services that vexes buyers; it’s also law’s asynchronous culture, structure, economic model, protracted delivery cycle, cost unpredictability, one-dimensional expertise, that has legal buyers looking for alternatives to “the usual suspects.” Add to that law’s failing grades on diversity, equal-pay-for-equal services, client-driven metrics, and one can readily understand why there’s flat demand for law firm services in a steadily expanding market.

Legal providers would be wise to address delivery deficits and the roots of consumer discontent rather than fixate on “innovation.” That means focusing on what legal buyers want rather, not what they can sell.  Improvement and investment in customers—not innovation as an end unto itself—is what matters. Successful companies invest in customer-focused resources—people, technology, infrastructure, data, and customer relations—to satisfy customers and forge relationships that become assets. “Customer-centric approach” is not a buzzword; it is commitment to process, investment, performance metrics and constant improvement that creates value for consumers. It’s hard work.

Too Many Claims of “Innovation” and Too Few Answers

Law is enamored of innovation, perhaps because it has been devoid of it for so long. Innovation is a term that is widely used but lacks a common definition. The experts seem to agree on four seminal elements: (1) it is a process; (2) where ideas are turned into solutions; (3) that add value; and (4) from the customer perspective. Nick Skillicorn, a leading blogger and consultant, defines innovation as “Turning an idea into a solution that adds value from a customer’s perspective.” Innovation is constructed from the consumer perspective–what do they want that they cannot obtain from existing service or product providers that creates value for them? Law firms take an inverted approach—what can we sell to clients that does not require us to materially alter our delivery structure or economic model? This approach is “anti-innovative.”

Corporate legal departments—many of whom initially had law firm mentalities and operated that way—are now thinking more like the businesses they represent. In-house counsel play a dual role of corporate defender and business partner. They are members of the business while adhering to legal ethical and practice standards. They are business experts with a legal background. This is similar to a new breed of well-capitalized, tech and business savvy alternative legal service providers (ALSP’s a/k/a law companies)—United Lex, Axiom, Integreon and others including the Big Four—are forging innovative approaches to legal delivery designed to suit customer needs. In each case, the delivery model was constructed de novo, starting with “what do buyers of our services need and how can we make that happen?”

Customer Satisfaction is the By-Product of Innovation

 Many firms have chief innovation officers (CIO’s) and innovation departments. What does that mean? And why, if there is such a proliferation of “innovation” are legal consumers dissatisfied and aggressively seeking providers with new delivery models, inter-disciplinary expertise, measurable results, and scalability? Short answer: “innovation” starts with the customer perspective—not the provider’s—and applies new ideas that drive value to customers. Very few law firms come close to doing this. Most continue to offer undifferentiated services, raise rates, scour the market for big-book laterals, and expand marketing budgets. This is neither a “customer-centric approach” nor is it “innovation.” Legal providers—especially traditional partnership model firms—would be wise to view the marketplace from the customer perspective. What does that look like? Legal buyers want rapid, risk-assessed, responsive answers to business challenges from experts with relevant experience that rely on relevant data and an understanding of their business to craft strategies. Legal providers that can deliver actionable solutions on a consistent, cost-effective and scalable basis will achieve customer satisfaction and loyalty. Whether that process results from improvement of existing practices or innovative new ones is of little moment. It’s customer satisfaction that matters.

Conclusion

 Legal consumers, not lawyers, are driving the bus now. They are the judges of performance. Lawyers can continue to hand out awards and liberally designate peers as “innovators.” But if clients are not satisfied, the moniker is an oxymoronic punchline, not a recognition of excellence.

Read More

Tags: Attorney JobsGLIGlobal Legal Recruiting Networklaw firm jobslegal careerslegal search firmNancy Grimes
0 Comments
0
Share

About In the News

This author hasn't written their bio yet.
In the News has contributed 244 entries to our website, so far. View entries by In the News.

You also might be interested in

Breaking down the top 10 most important medals in U.S. Winter Olympics history

Breaking down the top 10 most important medals in U.S. Winter Olympics history

Feb 15, 2018

GEOFF CALKINS  |  USA TODAY NETWORK – TENNESSEE PYEONGCHANG, South Korea[...]

Calling HR Managers in New Jersey

Calling HR Managers in New Jersey

May 16, 2019

Looking for an experienced HR Manager.  This is a newly[...]

Quinn Emanuel’s New Marketing Initiative: An Interview With John Quinn

May 11, 2015

On Friday, we brought you news of litigation powerhouse Quinn[...]

Leave a Reply

Your email is safe with us.
Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Count Down Your Year-End Goals

weeks
0
2
days
0
1
hours
1
7
minutes
4
6
seconds
0
1

Pages

  • About- Legally Speaking

Archives

  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008

Categories

  • 2018
  • 2019
  • Attorney Articles
  • Attorney Ethics
  • Attorney Jobs
  • attorney science
  • attorney testimony
  • Billionaire Lesson
  • Canadian Cannabis
  • Career Advice
  • Celebrate
  • Charity
  • Compensation
  • compliance and regulation
  • Days of Christmas
  • Don'ts
  • Finance
  • Flu
  • Fun
  • Generational
  • GLI
  • Global Legal Recruiting
  • Globalization
  • Goals
  • Gratitude
  • Grimes Legal
  • Grimes Legal Inc.
  • Halloween
  • happy attorney
  • Happy Halloween
  • Happy Holidays
  • Health Care
  • Healthy Success
  • Hello 2018
  • Helpers helping
  • Herstory
  • History
  • Holiday Traditions
  • Hurricane Relief
  • Immigration
  • immigration proposal
  • Immigration reform
  • Job Searches
  • Job Survey
  • Jobs
  • Lady Law
  • Lawsuit of the Day
  • Lawyer Articles
  • Lawyer Jobs
  • Legal Careers
  • Legal Employment
  • Legal Executive Recruiter
  • Legal Headhunter
  • Legal Humor
  • Legal Job Placement
  • Legal Job Search
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal News
  • Legal Placement
  • Legal Practice
  • Legal Recruiter
  • Legal Recruiting
  • Legal Recruiting Firm
  • Legal Salaries
  • Legal Search Firm
  • Legal Staffing
  • legally speaking
  • legallyspeaking
  • Marijuana
  • mental health
  • Monday Musings
  • Morning Docket
  • Nancy Says
  • new bill
  • new york attorney
  • Olympics
  • Pro Con
  • Recipes
  • Retired Attorney
  • Retirement
  • sexism in the workplace
  • status
  • Success
  • Tax Reform
  • Technology
  • Thanksgiving
  • Top Recruitment
  • Travel Tips
  • trump
  • Uncategorized
  • workplace
  • World News
  • Young Attorney
  • Young Lawyer

Contact Us

We're currently offline. Send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Send Message

© [2016] · Legally Speaking. Theme by HB-Themes.

  • About- Legally Speaking
  • Back to Grimes Legal Inc.
Prev Next