GRG provides project-managed document review solutions and has the highest standard for coding, review and production of ESI and hard copy information. We provide:
-
Objective and Subjective Coding and Document Indexing
-
Document Review and Analysis at a Very Competitive Price
-
Information Management Strategy and Implementation
-
Integration With Case Management Tools
-
Predictable Pricing
-
Established, Stable Staff
-
Certified Legal Project Managers
-
Transparent Processes
Representative areas of business disputes include:
-
Medical Products
-
Intellectual Property Disputes
-
Antitrust
-
Toxic Tort
-
Financial Investigations
-
Regulatory Compliance
-
Employment and Labor Disputes
-
Mergers and Acquisitions
-
Government Investigations
-
Consumer Fraud
Here’s how we do it:
Each GRG project manager and its co-founders are certified legal project managers.
-
Each project manager has significant experience managing paper and electronic document review projects and each has worked on a variety of complex matters involving topics such as medical products, intellectual property disputes, antitrust, toxic tort, financial investigations and regulatory compliance, employment and labor disputes, and mergers and acquisitions.
-
Review staff includes former judges, in-house counsel, trial attorneys, engineers, law firm partners, patent attorneys, State and Federal government attorneys, real estate attorneys, environmental attorneys, and attorneys with banking and financial experience. Many review attorneys are fluent in a variety of languages, including Korean, Japanese, Chinese, Spanish and German.
-
The leadership team relies heavily on fundamental principles of project management as being key to the success of every e-discovery project – emphasizing the importance of controlling scope, budget, time constraint and quality, above all other things.
-
Lines of communication between GRG and the litigation team are 24/7 and substantive questions concerning relevance, privilege, issue tags, etc., are clarified on an ongoing basis by the litigation team.
-
The entire review team works together, in the same room and communication is active – questions, answers, and policy changes are shared among the review team on an ongoing basis.
-
5-8% of all reviewed documents are subject to eyes on accuracy validation by the project manager or quality team.
-
Various methods of QA are utilized, including: tag analysis (e.g., based on custodian), individual reviewer speed and decision pattern analysis, purely random review of documents (including those tagged non-responsive); key word isolation of documents and document types known to cause confusion or tagging error; etc.
-
Errors of judgment (e.g., those caused by speed or individual confusion) are addressed at the individual reviewer level and QA steps are taken to compare and analyze decisions that could result in a similar error on both previously reviewed data and data decisions moving forward.
-
Errors of substance caused by confusing policy, complex tag structure, and otherwise “odd” document types are addressed at the team level -meetings are held, the litigation team is consulted and all policy changes are logged in a project diary by date and decision. QA steps are taken to retroactively adjust decisions affected by policy change.
-
100% of all documents slated for production are subject to various forms of final QC for privilege.
Your data is secure.GRG’s facilities are complete with card-entry, monitored and double-locked entry systems enabling only authorized personnel in the building.
-
Each project space has the ability to be isolated from any other project in the facility.
-
Security cameras are in full use at all times.
-
Data is never hosted on site, but rests behind the client or service provider firewall and is accessed in the cloud.
-
Our data networks (pipe in/out) are firewalled and completely secure.